Kaighn v. Burgin

56 N.J. Eq. 852
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reason given in the court of chancery .as to the jurisdiction of the court over the case and the right of the mortgagee to redeem the interest of the appellant in the property acquired under a tax sale under the Martin act, and reversed as to costs, which were adjudged against the appellant in the court of chancery.

For concurrence — Depue, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh — 7.

Far non-concurrence — Collins, Dixon, Adams, Bogert — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaighn v. Burgin, 56 N.J. Eq. 852 (N.J. 1898).

56 N.J. Eq. 852 (Kaighn v. Burgin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barry, Inc. v. Baf, Limited
65 A.2d 761 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)