Kaighn v. Burgin
This text of 56 N.J. Eq. 852 (Kaighn v. Burgin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reason given in the court of chancery .as to the jurisdiction of the court over the case and the right of the mortgagee to redeem the interest of the appellant in the property acquired under a tax sale under the Martin act, and reversed as to costs, which were adjudged against the appellant in the court of chancery.
For concurrence — Depue, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh — 7.
Far non-concurrence — Collins, Dixon, Adams, Bogert — 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.J. Eq. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaighn-v-burgin-nj-1898.