Ka'iama v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
This text of Ka'iama v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (Ka'iama v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 31-AUG-2022 11:44 AM Dkt. 7 ORD
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
DEXTER K. KAʻIAMA, Petitioner,
vs.
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent, ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC No. 18-0339)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the materials submitted on
August 25, 2022 to the appellate clerks by attorney Dexter K.
Kaʻiama, which was filed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, we
conclude that attorney Kaʻiama seeks relief from the Disciplinary
Board of the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court, not from this court.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied
without prejudice to attorney Kaʻiama seeking relief from the
Disciplinary Board.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 31, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ka'iama v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiama-v-office-of-disciplinary-counsel-haw-2022.