Kahr v. Cole
This text of Kahr v. Cole (Kahr v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MICHAEL M. KAHR, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
MICHAEL E. COLE, IRON WORKS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________
2017-1391 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in No. 1:13-cv-01005-WCG, Chief Judge William C. Griesbach. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
SHERRY DAWN COLEY, Davis & Kuelthau, SC, Green Bay, WI, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JAMES EARL LOWE, JR., MATTHEW R. MCCLEAN, Mil- waukee, WI.
PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by BRETT KLEIN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, SCHALL, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kahr v. Cole, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahr-v-cole-cafc-2017.