Kahn v. Kahn

271 A.D.2d 788

This text of 271 A.D.2d 788 (Kahn v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kahn v. Kahn, 271 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of an official referee modifying a judgment of divorce by striking out a provision thereof requiring defendant to pay $35 per week for the support of a child, and substituting therefor a provision transferring the custody of the child to a private institution and requiring the defendant to pay the reasonable charges for the child’s maintenance and care thereat, dismissed, without costs. Pending appeal, execution of the order appealed from has been stayed, the defendant has complied with the requirements of the original decree and the child whose custody is involved has attained his majority. The issues in this divorce action as to custody and maintenance of the child have become academic. Adequate remedies exist to compel the support of adult children where they are physically unable to take care of themselves, whether in the form of an action for necessaries furnished, or otherwise. (Moskowitz v. Moskowitz, 269 App. Div. 710; Shapiro v. Shapiro, 256 App. Div. 838; Halsted v. Halsted, 228 App. Div. 298; Johnstone v. Johnstone, 130 Mise. 243.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 835, 876.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halsted v. Halsted
228 A.D. 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Shapiro v. Shapiro
256 A.D. 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Moskowitz v. Moskowitz
269 A.D. 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahn-v-kahn-nyappdiv-1946.