Kahn v. Kahn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kahn v. Kahn

896 S.W.2d 679, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 544

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 28, 1995

DocketNo. 66001

StatusPublished

This text of 896 S.W.2d 679 (Kahn v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kahn v. Kahn, 896 S.W.2d 679, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 544 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from a judgment entered after remand in Kahn v. Kahn, 846 S.W.2d 219 (Mo.App.1993). The trial court ordered husband to pay wife $122,015.88 in attorney’s fees incurred by wife as a defendant in a Kentucky lawsuit.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI