Kahn v. Commissioner

12 T.C.M. 378, 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedApril 8, 1953
DocketDocket No. 35725.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 T.C.M. 378 (Kahn v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kahn v. Commissioner, 12 T.C.M. 378, 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306 (tax 1953).

Opinion

David E. Kahn and Lucille P. Kahn v. Commissioner.
Kahn v. Commissioner
Docket No. 35725.
United States Tax Court
1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306; 12 T.C.M. (CCH) 378; T.C.M. (RIA) 53115;
April 8, 1953
*306 Benjamin Mahler, Esq., for the petitioners. John James O'Toole, Esq., for the respondent.

RAUM

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

RAUM, Judge: The petitioners, residents of New York, New York, filed a joint income tax return for the year 1942 with the collector of internal revenue for the fourteenth district of New York. On the return there was claimed a deduction for a worthless debt in the amount of $46,289.06. The Commissioner refused to allow the deduction. By reason of the forgiveness feature of the Current Tax Payment Act of 1943, the Commissioner did not determine a deficiency for 1942, but his disallowance of that deduction, together with another adjustment not now in controversy, resulted in a determination of a deficiency in income and victory tax in the amount of $33,096.08 for 1943. It is that deficiency which is here in controversy.

A stipulation of some of the facts has been filed by the parties, and the facts thus stipulated are found and incorporated herein by reference.

Petitioner David E. Kahn made a loan to one Isaac Lande in February 1930 in an amount of not less than $40,330. In 1932, the loan agreement was reduced to writing. It provided, *307 inter alia, as follows:

"WITNESSETH:

"Heretofore and on or about the 1st day of February, 1930, Kahn loaned to Lande securities of the then market value of $40,330. Said securities are referred to in a letter dated February 1, 1930, signed by Lande and addressed to Kahn. Lande agreed to return said securities to Kahn on May 1, 1930, but has not done so. Lande has paid over to Kahn on account of dividends received from said securities the sum of $1,914.25. Lande recognizes his obligation to Kahn in the said sum of $40,330 with interest at six per cent. (6%) from February 1, 1930, which interest to February 1, 1932 amounts to $4,839.60, against which interest Lande is entitled to credit for said sum of $1,914.25 leaving a balance owing on February 1, 1932 by Lande to Kahn in the amount of $40,330. on account of principal and $2,925.35 on account of interest (after crediting the aforesaid dividends).

"In consideration of the premises and of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) by each of the parties to the other in hand, paid, receipt of which is acknowledged, it is AGREED as follows:

"1. - Lande's obligations under the aforesaid letter dated February 1, 1930 are cancelled and Lande*308 is released therefrom.

"2. - Lande agrees to pay to Kahn on or before the 1st day of April, 1932 the sum of $2,925.35, being balance of interest due as of February 1, 1932.

"3. - Lande agrees to pay Kahn the principal amount of his indebtedness, to wit, $40,330. in instalments of $5,000. quarterly commencing May 1, 1933 and the balance of said principal amount in full on January 31, 1935. Lande is given the right to anticipate payment of said principal amount in whole or in part at any time previous to January 31, 1935.

"4. - Lande agrees to pay Kahn interest at the rate of six per cent. (6%n per annum on said principal amount of $40,330. and unpaid balance quarterly commencing May 1, 1932.

"5. - If Lande shall default in making any payment on account of principal or interest, the entire balance of Lande's indebtedness remaining unpaid shall become immediately due and payable with interest.

"6. - Lande agrees to assign to Kahn (if he shall not already have done so) policy No. 964,756, issued by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co., the effective date of which is June 4, 1930, insuring Lande's life in the amount of $50,000. Kahn acknowledges that said assignment is collateral*309 security for Lande's obligations under this agreement. Upon payment in full of the amounts required to be paid by Lande under this agreement, Kahn agrees to reassign to Lande said insurance policy and Kahn further agrees in the event of Lande's death that any sum received under said insurance policy in excess of the sums due by Lande to Kahn under this agreement shall be paid by Kahn to Lande's representatives.

"7. - Lande agrees to pay promptly the premiums on said insurance policy No. 964,756 and further agrees that if any of said premiums are not paid when due and remain unpaid after expiration of the grace period allowed by said policy, the entire balance of Lande's indebtedness then remaining unpaid shall immediately become due and payable with interest."

The terms of the agreement were never complied with; the $5,000 payments specified were never made. The record before us fails to disclose whether the life insurance policy mentioned was ever in fact put up as collateral or whether, if it was, premiums were paid thereon as required; nor does it show that interest was ever paid on the loan.

Lande and Kahn were friends. Lande was a practicing lawyer and did considerable legal*310 work for Kahn. Kahn testified that he made additional cash loans to Lande, from time to time, bringing the aggregate indebtedness up to about $51,000; that Lande had repaid about $2,500; that the value of Lande's legal services was about $2,000; and that the net difference represented the amount of $46,289.06, which was claimed as a bad debt on the 1942 return.

The testimony as to the additional cash loans was far too vague and unsatisfactory to be accepted by us at face value. Nor are we satisfied that the value of Lande's legal services, extending over a period of years, was only $2,000. However, it is not necessary to make any findings in respect of the asserted additional loans, partial repayments, or the value of Lande's legal services, because of our conclusion that the debt from Lande to Kahn, whatever its net amount, became worthless prior to 1942, and could not be allowed as a deduction for that year.

Lande died suddenly on November 7, 1941, at the age of 57. Although he appears to have had a moderately successful legal practice, he was hopelessly involved financially. His debts about 1940 or 1941 were in the aggregate about $250,000, and he had no assets of any consequence. *311 His debts were of long standing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucille P. Kahn v. United States
590 F.2d 48 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Kahn v. United States
444 F. Supp. 388 (S.D. New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 T.C.M. 378, 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahn-v-commissioner-tax-1953.