Kahn v. Coles

New York Supreme Court

Kahn v. Coles

115 N.Y.S. 885

DecidedMarch 15, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 115 N.Y.S. 885 (Kahn v. Coles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kahn v. Coles, 115 N.Y.S. 885 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

GERARD, J.

Motion to punish officers of a corporation for contempt. Kahn had a judgment against Coles, and obtained an order, under the recent amendment of the Code, directing the corporation in whose employ Coles was alleged to be to pay to the sheriff for the creditor’s benefit 10 per cent, of the debtor’s salary. It is alleged that the corporation has failed to pay over this 10 per cent., and plaintiff now seeks to punish its officers as for a contempt.

Code Civ. Proc. § 1391, which provides for this form of execution, provides the remedy as follows:

“If such person or corporation, municipal or otherwise, to whom such execution shall be presented, shall fail or refuse to pay over to said officer presenting said execution the percentage of said indebtedness, he shall be liable to an action therefor by the judgment creditor named in such execution, and the amount so recovered by such judgment creditor shall be applied towards the payment of said execution.”

I am of opinion that the Legislature has indicated that remedy by action shall be the only remedy of the creditor, and that contempt proceedings will not lie.

Motion denied, with costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GERARD, J.

Motion to punish officers of a corporation for contempt. Kahn had a judgment against Coles, and obtained an order, under the recent amendment of the Code, directing the corporation in whose employ Coles was alleged to be to pay to the sheriff for the creditor’s benefit 10 per cent, of the debtor’s salary. It is alleged that the corporation has failed to pay over this 10 per cent., and plaintiff now seeks to punish its officers as for a contempt.

Code Civ. Proc. § 1391, which provides for this form of execution, provides the remedy as follows:

“If such person or corporation, municipal or otherwise, to whom such execution shall be presented, shall fail or refuse to pay over to said officer presenting said execution the percentage of said indebtedness, he shall be liable to an action therefor by the judgment creditor named in such execution, and the amount so recovered by such judgment creditor shall be applied towards the payment of said execution.”

I am of opinion that the Legislature has indicated that remedy by action shall be the only remedy of the creditor, and that contempt proceedings will not lie.

Motion denied, with costs. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 N.Y.S. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahn-v-coles-nysupct-1909.