Kahn v. Bamberger

Indiana Supreme Court

Kahn v. Bamberger

20 Ind. 212

DecidedMay 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ind. 212 (Kahn v. Bamberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kahn v. Bamberger, 20 Ind. 212 (Ind. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

This was an action by Kahn against the ap[213]*213pellees to recover possession of certain personal property. Issue, ti'ial, vei’dict and judgment for the defendants.

Chandler $ Hines, for the appellant. A. L. Robinson, for the appellees.

The case is before us on the evidence, from a careful examination of which we are of the opinion that it wholly fails to sustain the verdict; hence a motion which Was' made for a new trial should have prevailed. ■

The judgment below is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,.

This was an action by Kahn against the ap[213]*213pellees to recover possession of certain personal property. Issue, ti'ial, vei’dict and judgment for the defendants.

Chandler $ Hines, for the appellant. A. L. Robinson, for the appellees.

The case is before us on the evidence, from a careful examination of which we are of the opinion that it wholly fails to sustain the verdict; hence a motion which Was' made for a new trial should have prevailed. ■

The judgment below is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ind. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahn-v-bamberger-ind-1863.