Kahlman Linker & Dynamism v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc

Second Circuit

Kahlman Linker & Dynamism v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc

556 F.2d 557

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 1977

Docket76-7453

StatusPublished

This text of 556 F.2d 557 (Kahlman Linker & Dynamism v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kahlman Linker & Dynamism v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc, 556 F.2d 557 (2d Cir. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

556 F.2d 557

Kahlman Linker & Dynamism
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

No. 76-7453

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

3/16/77

S.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED*

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no juri sprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opi nion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0 .23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

556 F.2d 557

Kahlman Linker & Dynamism
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

No. 76-7453

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

3/16/77

S.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED*

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no juri sprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opi nion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0 .23

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 F.2d 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahlman-linker-dynamism-v-merrill-lynch-pierce-fen-ca2-1977.