Kahlilia Davis v. Judicial Tenure Commission
This text of Kahlilia Davis v. Judicial Tenure Commission (Kahlilia Davis v. Judicial Tenure Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 25, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161818 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra KAHLILIA DAVIS, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161818 JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED to the extent that the information sought does not relate to the allegations of Formal Complaint No. 101 for the reason that there is no “proceeding” before the Judicial Tenure Commission within the meaning of MCR 9.211(C). In all other respects, the complaint for superintending control is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 25, 2020 a1118 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kahlilia Davis v. Judicial Tenure Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kahlilia-davis-v-judicial-tenure-commission-mich-2020.