Kahala v. Aldrich

169 A. 291, 112 N.J.L. 18, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 294
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 7, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kahala v. Aldrich, 169 A. 291, 112 N.J.L. 18, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 294 (N.J. 1933).

169 A. 291 (Kahala v. Aldrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.