Kafton v. Wickberg
3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 586, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 283
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kafton v. Wickberg, 3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 586, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1939).
3 A.2d 574 (Kafton v. Wickberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keller v. Frank Kull, Inc.
398 A.2d 106 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)