Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co.

506 P.2d 362, 181 Colo. 19

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedFebruary 20, 1973

DocketNo. C-192

StatusPublished

This text of 506 P.2d 362 (Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co., 506 P.2d 362, 181 Colo. 19 (Colo. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[20]*20Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Kaesik v. Mitchell, 30 Colo. App. 227, 492 P.2d 871. We affirm.

We find it unnecessary to restate the facts which gave rise to the controversy between the parties, as they are succinctly set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, with which we agree.

We conclude, as did the Court of Appeals, after our full review of the record of proceedings, that no prejudicial errors were committed by the trial court, in its conduct of the trial generally or, specifically, in its evidentiary rulings or in the instructions given to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[20]*20Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Kaesik v. Mitchell, 30 Colo. App. 227, 492 P.2d 871. We affirm.

We find it unnecessary to restate the facts which gave rise to the controversy between the parties, as they are succinctly set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, with which we agree.

We conclude, as did the Court of Appeals, after our full review of the record of proceedings, that no prejudicial errors were committed by the trial court, in its conduct of the trial generally or, specifically, in its evidentiary rulings or in the instructions given to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 P.2d 362, 181 Colo. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaesik-v-john-e-mitchell-co-colo-1973.