Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co.

506 P.2d 362, 181 Colo. 19

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 20, 1973·No. No. C-192·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[20] Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Kaesik v. Mitchell, 30 Colo. App. 227, 492 P.2d 871. We affirm.

We find it unnecessary to restate the facts which gave rise to the controversy between the parties, as they are succinctly set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, with which we agree.

We conclude, as did the Court of Appeals, after our full review of the record of proceedings, that no prejudicial errors were committed by the trial court, in its conduct of the trial generally or, specifically, in its evidentiary rulings or in the instructions given to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[20] Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Kaesik v. Mitchell, 30 Colo. App. 227, 492 P.2d 871. We affirm.

We find it unnecessary to restate the facts which gave rise to the controversy between the parties, as they are succinctly set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, with which we agree.

We conclude, as did the Court of Appeals, after our full review of the record of proceedings, that no prejudicial errors were committed by the trial court, in its conduct of the trial generally or, specifically, in its evidentiary rulings or in the instructions given to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co., 506 P.2d 362, 181 Colo. 19 (Colo. 1973).

Pincite

506 P.2d 362 (Kaesik v. John E. Mitchell Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.