Kaemmerlen v. Shannon

119 So. 2d 315, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2451
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1960·No. No. 1498·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is not from the final decree, but from the order denying the petition for rehearing. The appeal will have to be dismissed ex mero motu. Finley v. Finley, Fla.1958, 103 So.2d 191; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App., 1959, 110 So.2d 73.

Appeal dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaemmerlen v. Shannon, 119 So. 2d 315, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2451 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

119 So. 2d 315 (Kaemmerlen v. Shannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Zager
387 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Greyhound Corp. v. Carswell
171 So. 2d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Stevens v. Metropolitan Dade County
164 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)