Kaehler v. North German Lloyd

New York Court of Appeals

Kaehler v. North German Lloyd

46 N.E.2d 342, 289 N.Y. 407, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1160

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 14, 1943

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 N.E.2d 342 (Kaehler v. North German Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaehler v. North German Lloyd, 46 N.E.2d 342, 289 N.Y. 407, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1160 (N.Y. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint, as limited by the bill of particulars accused defendant of one kind of negligence only, i. e., faulty construction. There was no real or substantial evidence of negligent maintenance of the bench. The trial court’s charge to the jury which limited the basis for recovery, and to which no exception was taken, was therefore correct. In this situation, a verdict for plaintiff against the carrier necessarily imported a finding of negli *410 gent construction and so justified a verdict over in favor of that defendant against the impleaded defendant.

The judgment of the Appellate Division so far as appealed from, should be reversed and that of the trial court, affirmed, with ■ costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The complaint, as limited by the bill of particulars accused defendant of one kind of negligence only, i. e., faulty construction. There was no real or substantial evidence of negligent maintenance of the bench. The trial court’s charge to the jury which limited the basis for recovery, and to which no exception was taken, was therefore correct. In this situation, a verdict for plaintiff against the carrier necessarily imported a finding of negli *410 gent construction and so justified a verdict over in favor of that defendant against the impleaded defendant.

The judgment of the Appellate Division so far as appealed from, should be reversed and that of the trial court, affirmed, with ■ costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.E.2d 342, 289 N.Y. 407, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaehler-v-north-german-lloyd-ny-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack