Kaeding v. Hacking
This text of 287 N.W. 876 (Kaeding v. Hacking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss an appeal from order of district court of Hennepin county denying motion to discharge a garnishee, the motion being made after disclosure, on the ground that “the moneys in the possession of said garnishee * * * are trust funds belonging to persons other than defendants herein.” The motion to discharge the garnishee does not expressly or by implication question the jurisdiction of the district *649 court over the person or property of the garnishee. Therefore the order is not appealable. Shallbeter v. George M. Bernstein Co. 174 Minn. 604, 218 N. W. 730, and cases cited.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 N.W. 876, 206 Minn. 648, 1939 Minn. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaeding-v-hacking-minn-1939.