Kadmiri Vs. Dist. Ct. (Mgm Grand Resorts Int'L)

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: November 20, 2020
• Docket: 81903
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOEY KADMIRI, No. 81903 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ILEL COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NOV 0 am CLARK, PREME CO Respondent, and DEPUTY CLERK

MGM GRAND RESORTS INTL.; NEW CASTLE, LLC; AND EXCALIBUR HOTEL AND CASINO, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges various district court orders in a tort action. Petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

40) 1947A POW

• Irfi lFIS.;" We reiterate that Ipletitioned ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth

Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition ENIED.1 C.J. Pickering

LitZ4XAD , J.

Hardesty Silver

cc: Joey Kadmiri Pyatt Silvestri Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this disposition, petitioner's request for leave to amend his petition is denied as moot.