Kadlec v. Kadlec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kadlec v. Kadlec

24 A.D.2d 899, 265 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 899 (Kadlec v. Kadlec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kadlec v. Kadlec, 24 A.D.2d 899, 265 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 13, 1965, which granted plaintiff’s motion and (1) directed defendant to vacate the marital premises; (2) required him to pay $25 per week for the temporary support of the plaintiff wife and four children and to pay the monthly mortgage installments on said marital premises; (3) permitted the wife to rent the upstairs apartment of said premises to anyone but her relatives and to retain the income therefrom; and (4) directed defendant to pay the wife’s counsel fee of $250. Order affirmed, without costs. The defendant’s time to comply with the terms of the order is extended until 5 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, the interests of the parties would be best served if the parties proceeded to trial at an early date. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 13, 1965, which granted plaintiff’s motion and (1) directed defendant to vacate the marital premises; (2) required him to pay $25 per week for the temporary support of the plaintiff wife and four children and to pay the monthly mortgage installments on said marital premises; (3) permitted the wife to rent the upstairs apartment of said premises to anyone but her relatives and to retain the income therefrom; and (4) directed defendant to pay the wife’s counsel fee of $250. Order affirmed, without costs. The defendant’s time to comply with the terms of the order is extended until 5 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, the interests of the parties would be best served if the parties proceeded to trial at an early date. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 899, 265 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kadlec-v-kadlec-nyappdiv-1965.