Kadison v. Horton
59 A.2d 587, 142 N.J. Eq. 223, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 652
Opinion
The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Grimsliaw.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Sohettino, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kadison v. Horton, 59 A.2d 587, 142 N.J. Eq. 223, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 652 (N.J. 1948).
59 A.2d 587 (Kadison v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyland v. Kirkman
385 A.2d 284 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)