Kaderavek v. Fuetterer
233 A.D. 775
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 233 A.D. 775 (Kaderavek v. Fuetterer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kaderavek v. Fuetterer, 233 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff did not seasonably make a motion to amend the verdict and now his only remedy is to move to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. (MacDonald v. Kusch, 188 App. Div. 491.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MacDonald v. Kusch
188 A.D. 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaderavek-v-fuetterer-nyappdiv-1931.