Kaderavek v. Fuetterer
233 A.D. 775
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff did not seasonably make a motion to amend the verdict and now his only remedy is to move to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. (MacDonald v. Kusch, 188 App. Div. 491.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaderavek v. Fuetterer, 233 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
233 A.D. 775 (Kaderavek v. Fuetterer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacDonald v. Kusch
188 A.D. 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)