Kadeem Edwards v. Sukhmani Bassi; California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 26, 2026·No. 1:23-cv-01180·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KADEEM EDWARDS, 1:23-cv-01180-KES-EGC (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ENTER DEFAULT AS TO 13 v. SUKHMANI BASSI

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (Doc. 43) CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION,

16 Defendant.

17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Bassi on Plaintiff’s Eighth 20 Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim. 21 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 On February 28, 2024, the Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate, directing 23 that service be effected on Sukhmani Bassi, a licensed vocational nurse at Valley State Prison in 24 Chowchilla, California. (Doc. 18.) 25 On April 19, 2024, a waiver of service was filed on Defendant Bassi’s behalf and a 26 responsive pleading was to be filed on or before May 21, 2024. (Doc. 22.) On May 16, 2024, a 27 request for a 45-day extension of time to respond to the complaint was filed with the Court. (Doc. 28 23.) The request was granted, and a responsive pleading was to be filed no later than June 20, 1 2024. (Doc. 24.) On June 19, 2024, a second request for a 45-day extension of time was 2 submitted. (Doc. 25.) The request was granted with a responsive pleading due no later than 3 August 5, 2024. (Doc. 26.) 4 On July 30, 2024, a Notice of Motion and Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant 5 S. Bassi was filed with the Court. (Doc. 27.) On July 31, 2024, the Court issued its Order Staying 6 the Deadline for the Filing of a Responsive Pleading. (Doc. 29.) Following supplemental briefing 7 (see Docs. 29 & 31), the Court issued its Order Granting Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for 8 Defendant Bassi on September 19, 2024. (Doc. 34.) Defense counsel was directed to serve 9 Defendant Bassi with a copy of the Court’s order at her last known address and to provide the 10 Court with Bassi’s last known address under seal. (Id. at 4-5.) Counsel complied.1 (See Doc. 35.) 11 On October 15, 2024, the Court issued its Order Lifting Stay of Deadline for the Filing of 12 a Responsive Pleading, Order Requiring Defendant Bassi to File Response to Plaintiff’s 13 Complaint Within Thirty (30) Days, and Order Directing Clerk to Serve Defendant Bassi at Her 14 Last Known Address(es). (See Doc. 37.) 15 On November 4, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Order Requesting Default 16 Judgment Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 55.” (Doc. 38.) 17 On May 5, 2025, the Court issued its Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Default 18 Judgment as Premature and Order to Show Cause (OSC) re Defendant Bassi’s Failure to File a 19 Responsive Pleading. (Doc. 39.) As to the latter, the Court directed Bassi to respond in writing 20 within 21 days and directed the Clerk of the Court to serve the order to Bassi “at all last known 21 addresses, kept confidential and accessible only to Court employees, excepting the post office box 22 in Chowchilla, California.” (Id. at 4-5.) 23 On July 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Request to Enter Default of Sukhmani Bassi. (Doc. 41.) 24 On October 16, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion Requesting an Interlocutory 25 Order.” (Doc. 43.) 26

27 1 Former defense counsel was inadvertently not served with the Court’s September 19, 2024, order, via the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. The Court subsequently contacted counsel and he 28 complied with the Court’s directives as requested. 1 On May 4, 2026, this action was reassigned to the undersigned as magistrate judge 2 following the retirement of Sheila K. Oberto. (Doc. 45.) 3 II. DISCUSSION 4 Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 5 (a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise 6 defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default. 7 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “[a] defendant 9 must serve an answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or if it 10 has timely waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was 11 sent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Under Rule 4(d), a defendant may waive service of a summons 12 by signing and returning a waiver of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). And this Court’s e-service pilot 13 program provides that “CDCR shall file with the Court a ‘CDCR Notice of E-Service Waiver,’ 14 advising if the defendants waive service of process without need for personal service by the 15 United States Marshal. CDCR shall also advise if any defendant declines to waive service or 16 could not be located.” (Doc. 2, ¶ 5.) 17 Here, Defendant Bassi, against whom Plaintiff seeks relief for deliberate indifference to 18 serious medical needs arising under the Eighth Amendment, has failed to plead or otherwise 19 defend herself in this action. A review of the record for this action reveals that a waiver of service 20 was filed on Bassi’s behalf on April 19, 2024, making a responsive pleading due on or before 21 May 21, 2024. (See Doc. 22.) Thereafter, the Court granted two extensions of the responsive 22 pleading deadline, ultimately resetting the deadline to August 5, 2024. (See Docs. 24 & 26.) 23 Following the extensions, on July 30, 2024, Deputy Attorney General John W. Nam filed 24 a motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Bassi (see Doc. 27) that was ultimately granted by 25 the Court on September 19, 2024 (see Doc. 34). More specifically, Deputy Attorney General Nam 26 was directed to serve Defendant Bassi with a copy of the Court’s Order at her last known address, 27 the motion to withdraw as counsel of record was granted, Bassi was noted to be proceeding in 28 propria persona as defendant in this action, and the Clerk of the Court was directed to keep 1 Defendant Bassi’s law known address confidential. (Id. at 4-5.) Relatedly, on October 2, 2024, 2 Defendant Bassi’s last known addresses were filed under seal. (Doc. 35 [sealed].) Thereafter, 3 despite being served at various last known addresses, Defendant Bassi failed to respond to the 4 Court’s October 15, 2024, Order and the OSC issued May 5, 2025.2 5 Because Defendant Bassi was represented by counsel when the waiver of service was filed 6 on April 19, 2024, Bassi was obligated to file a responsive pleading despite the fact defense 7 counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel for Bassi was granted. See, e.g., Marsh v. Vegianelli, 8 No. 1:09-cv-01243-GSA-PC, 2012 WL 5505079, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2012) (concluding, in 9 relevant part, “that defendants Cano, Lovell, and Morgan timely waived service under Rule 4(d), 10 causing their ‘answer or motion under Rule 12’ to be due ‘within 60 days …’”); Stephen v. 11 Zhang, No. CIV S-09-1516 MCE EFB (TEMP) P, 2011 WL 2516244, at *2, fn. 3 (E.D. Cal. June 12 21, 2010) (directing Clerk to enter default of two defendants who executed waivers but failed to 13 respond to second amended complaint); Tyler v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kadeem Edwards v. Sukhmani Bassi; California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (E.D. Cal. 2026).

Kadeem Edwards v. Sukhmani Bassi; California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Kadeem Edwards v. Sukhmani Bassi; California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. Aldabe
616 F.2d 1089 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Pepsico, Inc. v. Triunfo-Mex, Inc.
189 F.R.D. 431 (C.D. California, 1999)