Kadanoff v. Stone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kadanoff v. Stone

121 A.D.2d 511, 503 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58486

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 511 (Kadanoff v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kadanoff v. Stone, 121 A.D.2d 511, 503 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated May 7, 1985, which, upon granting the defendant’s motion for reargument of a prior order of the same court, dated January 11, 1985, which denied her motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County, recalled and vacated the prior order and granted the motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The record amply supports Special Term’s findings, and Special Term did not abuse its discretion. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated May 7, 1985, which, upon granting the defendant’s motion for reargument of a prior order of the same court, dated January 11, 1985, which denied her motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County, recalled and vacated the prior order and granted the motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The record amply supports Special Term’s findings, and Special Term did not abuse its discretion. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 511, 503 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kadanoff-v-stone-nyappdiv-1986.