Kaczuwka v. Home Insurance

219 So. 2d 44
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1969·No. No. 2126·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of May v. Holley, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 636; Deen v. Weaver, Fla. 1950, 47 So.2d 539; Florida National Bank of Jacksonville v. Pugh, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 284; Saks v. Smith, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 895; and Colby v. Colby, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 797.

WALDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaczuwka v. Home Insurance, 219 So. 2d 44 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

219 So. 2d 44 (Kaczuwka v. Home Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May v. Holley
59 So. 2d 636 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Colby v. Colby
120 So. 2d 797 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Martineau v. City of Daytona Beach
47 So. 2d 538 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Saks v. Smith
145 So. 2d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Florida National Bank of Jacksonville v. Pugh
88 So. 2d 284 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)