Kacpura v. Hicks
130 N.E.2d 617, 309 N.Y. 821, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1573
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Ftjld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kacpura v. Hicks, 130 N.E.2d 617, 309 N.Y. 821, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1573 (N.Y. 1955).
130 N.E.2d 617 (Kacpura v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vermeer v. Hickman
368 P.2d 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)