Kacpura v. Hicks
130 N.E.2d 617, 309 N.Y. 821, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1573
This text of 130 N.E.2d 617 (Kacpura v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kacpura v. Hicks, 130 N.E.2d 617, 309 N.Y. 821, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1573 (N.Y. 1955).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Ftjld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vermeer v. Hickman
368 P.2d 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 N.E.2d 617, 309 N.Y. 821, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kacpura-v-hicks-ny-1955.