Kabnick v. O'Malley
This text of 50 A.D.2d 802 (Kabnick v. O'Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action inter alia for conversion to recover compensatory and punitive damages, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 29, 1974, as denied his motion to direct respondent to answer questions with respect to her wealth at her examination before trial. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements (Enos v Enos, 135 NY 609; Wilson v Onondaga Radio Broadcasting Corp., 175 Misc 389). Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 802, 375 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kabnick-v-omalley-nyappdiv-1975.