Kabelac v. Harding

127 A.D.2d 1011, 513 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43522
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 127 A.D.2d 1011 (Kabelac v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kabelac v. Harding, 127 A.D.2d 1011, 513 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, motion to dismiss appeal granted. Memorandum: We dismissed the appeal from the judgment entered by plaintiff on [1012]*1012July 15, 1986 because that judgment was duplicative of the judgment (denominated order) signed by the Trial Justice on April 24, 1986. The appeal properly lies from the April 24 judgment. Plaintiff contends that an appeal from the April 24 judgment would not be untimely because no notice of entry of that judgment has been served. That issue is not before us, however, for no appeal has been taken from the judgment of April 24. Present — Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Chendo O.
175 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Loughry v. Citibank
174 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.2d 1011, 513 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kabelac-v-harding-nyappdiv-1987.