Kabatt v. Graves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kabatt v. Graves

256 A.D. 1022, 10 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 1022 (Kabatt v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kabatt v. Graves, 256 A.D. 1022, 10 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order, dated October 24, 1935, which vacated an order of certiorari for the review of a decision of the Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, which dismissed an appeal taken by the petitioner from a decision of the board of education of the city of Elmira that fixed two years as the period for leaves of absence in maternity cases. The Special Term has decided that the allegations of the petition do not justify a review, upon the authority of Matter of Bullock v. Cooley (225 N. Y. 566); Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education (243 id. 373); Matter of O’Connor v. Emerson (196 App. Div. 807; affd., 232 N. Y. 561); People ex rel. Board of Education v. Finley (211 id. 51). Further, the question of the right to compensation has been adjudicated. (Kabatt v. Board of Education, 246 App. Div. 886; appeal dismissed, 271 N. Y. 629; motion for argument denied, 272 id. 508; certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court, 300 U. S. 657; Id. 687.) Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order, dated October 24, 1935, which vacated an order of certiorari for the review of a decision of the Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, which dismissed an appeal taken by the petitioner from a decision of the board of education of the city of Elmira that fixed two years as the period for leaves of absence in maternity cases. The Special Term has decided that the allegations of the petition do not justify a review, upon the authority of Matter of Bullock v. Cooley (225 N. Y. 566); Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education (243 id. 373); Matter of O’Connor v. Emerson (196 App. Div. 807; affd., 232 N. Y. 561); People ex rel. Board of Education v. Finley (211 id. 51). Further, the question of the right to compensation has been adjudicated. (Kabatt v. Board of Education, 246 App. Div. 886; appeal dismissed, 271 N. Y. 629; motion for argument denied, 272 id. 508; certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court, 300 U. S. 657; Id. 687.) Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1022, 10 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kabatt-v-graves-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack