Kaanaana v. Barrett Bus. Servs.
This text of 434 P.3d 1108 (Kaanaana v. Barrett Bus. Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Whether the phrase "work done for irrigation, utility, reclamation, and improvement districts, and other districts of this type" in Labor Code section 1720, subdivision (a)(2) of California's Prevailing Wage Law ( Labor Code §§ 1720 et. seq. ) should be interpreted to cover any type of work regardless of its nature, funding, purpose or function, including belt sorting at recycling facilities. The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 P.3d 1108, 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaanaana-v-barrett-bus-servs-cal-2019.