K & T Development Co. v. Quincey Mutual Fire Insurance

54 A.D.2d 753, 387 N.Y.S.2d 709
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action on an insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 10, 1976, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered thereon on March 9, 1976. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The affidavits submitted by plaintiff were insufficient to raise a triable issue as to defendant’s waiver of the limitation provision set forth in the policy. Since there was no indication that plaintiff was misled by defendant’s conduct, defendant was not estopped from raising the 12-month limitation provision (see Fotochrome, Inc. v American Ins. Co., 26 AD2d 634). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

K & T Development Co. v. Quincey Mutual Fire Insurance, 54 A.D.2d 753, 387 N.Y.S.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 753 (K & T Development Co. v. Quincey Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoesen v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance
86 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Van Hoesen v. Hogan
107 Misc. 2d 264 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Graziane v. Firemen's Insurance
63 A.D.2d 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)