K O M A, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tulsa Broadcasting Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

189 F.2d 390
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 1951
Docket4169_1
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 189 F.2d 390 (K O M A, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tulsa Broadcasting Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
K O M A, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tulsa Broadcasting Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 189 F.2d 390 (10th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Tax Court, approving the determination of the Commissioner that for the years 1943 and 1944 appellant taxpayers were subject to the surtax imposed by Section 102(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Internal Revenue Code, § 102(a).

Section 102(a) imposes an additional tax upon the net income of a corporation formed or availed of for the purpose of preventing the imposition of the surtax upon its stockholders or the stockholders of any other corporation, through the medium of permitting earnings or profits to accumulate instead of being divided or distributed. Section 102(c) provides that the fact that earnings or profits of a corporation are permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business shall be determinative of the purpose to avoid surtax upon the shareholders, unless the corporation by the clear preponderance of the evidence shall prove to the contrary.

KOMA

KOMA, an Oklahoma corporation, is engaged in the broadcasting business. It owns and operates station KOMA at Oklahoma City. J. T. Griffin and his estate after his death, John Toole Griffin, his son, and Marjory G. Leake, his daughter, owned-all of the common stock except a few qualifying shares and after 1944 owned all of its preferred stock and prior thereto all but one hundred shares thereof. Bryan Cole, who owned three qualifying shares of common stock, was Vice President of both corporations. Bryan Mathes, who owned three qualifying shares of common stock, was Secretary-Treasurer of both corporations and was also a Director of KOMA since its organization and of Tulsa since 1944. The preferred stock of KOMA had equal voting rights with the common stock. It was callable at the option of the corporation. The stockholders of KOMA and Tulsa controlled the Ogden Trust Company, Griffin Grocery Company of Arkansas, Griffin Grocery Company, Griffin Investment Company and Griffin-Goodner Grocery Company. J. T. Griffin owned about fifty-six per cent of the stock of the Griffin Grocery Company and his son and daughter owned all except eleven of the remaining shares in substantially equal amounts.

Prior to March, 1941, KOMA was operating AM broadcasting facilities on 1480 kilocycles with 5 kilowatts of power. In January, 1940 it applied to the Federal Communications Commission for permission to increase the power to 50 kilowatts on the same frequency. In March, 1940 the application was amended to change to 690 kilocycles. In March, 1941 the Commission authorized KOMA to operate on 1520 kilocycles with a non-directional antenna and the same power. KOMA filed applications later in that year to operate on 690 kilocycles with 50 kilowatts of power during the day and 25 at night, using a directional *392 antenna. In December of that year KOMA amended its application by requesting a reduction of operating power to 10 kilowatts day and night.

In April, 1942 the Commission issued an order to the effect that it would deny future applications involving the use of material to construct or change facilities of any standard television or high frequency broadcasting station. Provision was made • in the order for prosecution of pending applications, but failing to do so by June 1, 1942 was to be regarded as an abandonment of the application. This order remained in effect until August, 1945.

In November, 1945 the Commission granted an application filed October 4, 1945 to increase the power to 50 kilowatts on 1520 kilocycles, with directional antenna, and since January, 1947 KOMA has been operating on that power and frequency. The change was made in AM facilities, at a cost of $186,030.37 in 1946 and $31,061.23 in 1947.

In 1940 the Commission first made allocations of electrical power for commercial use of frequency modulation (FM) and experimental operation of television. Television was in its experimental stages in 1943 and 1944. The art of television broadcasting remained practically stationary during the last war. At various times prior to and during the taxable years in question, Bryan Mathes and Bryan Cole discussed with the chief engineers and general managers of both KOMA and Tulsa the question whether they should' eventually extend their facilities to include operation with FM and TV. The chief engineer of Tulsa estimated in 1942 that cost of facilities for broadcasting on FM and with TV would be from $250,000 to $500,000. In 1940 the chief engineer of KOMA guessed that the facilities for FM would cost from $160,000 to $200,000 and TV about $250,000. In 1943 and 1944 the manager of KOMA estimated that the cost for FM and TV would be a total of from $300,000 to $400,000, or more. One of the estimates made by directors of Tulsa was that the loss from operating of FM and TV would be $80,000 a year for.from three to five years. No formal action was taken by the board of directors of either corporation prior to or during the taxable years to engage in FM or TV operations. In July, 1945 KOMA, pursuant to authority by its directors on April 3, 1945, first made application to the Commission for permission to construct and operate a FM station and applied, for use of 50 kilowatts of power, at an estimated installation cost of $112,000. It was estimated in the application that operation costs would be $6,000 a month at the outset and $10,000 a month under normal conditions and that the income would be $15,000 a month at the end of three years. The final permit to operate FM was granted in July, 1946. Under an option granted by the Commissioner in 1947, KOMA acquired at a cost of $17,845.71 a 1 kilowatt transmitter for operation until a 50 kilowatt transmitter became available and started broadcasting in March, 1948. Other costs in 1947 for FM were $816.26. Delivery of a 50 kilowatt transmitter was not expected until January 1, 1949.

In July, 1948 KOMA, in accordance with a resolution passed by its directors on July 2, 1948, applied to the Commissioner for permission to operate a commercial TV station. No action had at the time of this trial been taken by the Commissioner under this application. It was estimated in the application that the cost of necessary equipment would be $238,925 and that the operating losses the first year would be $35,000. No TV equipment was available until 1948. Co-axial cables used to convey television programs were not available until 1950.

The surplus from earnings of KOMA increased from $30,000 at the close of 1938 to $130,270 at the close of 1942. In 1943 its surplus was $163,382 and in 1944 it was $210,404. In 1943 its net earnings were $36,382 and in 1944 they were $48,263. Its assets, current liabilities, capital stock and surplus, omitting cents, at the close of each year 1943 to 1947, inclusive, and net *393 earnings each year were as set out in footnote one. 1

Among its current assets for 1943, 1944 and 1945 were demand notes from the Griffin Grocery Company in the amounts of $30,000, $65,000 and $50,000, respectively. The note outstanding at the close of 1943, bearing interest at 1%%, was a renewal of demand loans made in 1941 and 1942 at 2% interest. The notes outstanding at the close of 1944 consisted of the 1943 note and a new demand note made on July 26, 1944 in the amount of $35,000 at lVz% interest. Each of these notes was paid on June 26, 1945.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpet Group International v. Oriental Rug Importers Ass'n
256 F. Supp. 2d 249 (D. New Jersey, 2003)
Inland Oil and Chemical Corporation v. United States
338 F. Supp. 1330 (D. Maryland, 1972)
Oklahoma Press Publishing Company v. United States
437 F.2d 1275 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
Schenuit Rubber Company v. United States
293 F. Supp. 280 (D. Maryland, 1968)
Ted Bates & Co. v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 251 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 248 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Bremerton Sun Publishing Co. v. Commissioner
44 T.C. 566 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Robert R. Walker, Inc. v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 28 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Henry Van Hummell, Inc. v. Commissioner
1964 T.C. Memo. 290 (U.S. Tax Court, 1964)
Electric Regulator Corp. v. Commissioner
40 T.C. 757 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Sterling Distributors, Inc. v. United States
313 F.2d 803 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Dixie, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
277 F.2d 526 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Wellman Operating Corp. v. Commissioner
33 T.C. 162 (U.S. Tax Court, 1959)
Dixie, Inc. v. Commissioner
31 T.C. 415 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 F.2d 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/k-o-m-a-inc-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-tulsa-broadcasting-co-ca10-1951.