K-N v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) M. K-N, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1123 (ABJ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
On January 6, 2014, Magistrate Judge Alan Kay issued an Amended Report and
Recommendation [Dkt. # 32] with respect to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt.
# 16] and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 18]. The Court has reviewed
Magistrate Judge Kay’s report and plaintiffs’ Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation [Dkt. # 31] and hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 32] is
ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. #
16] is granted in part and denied in part, and that defendant’s cross motion for summary
judgment [Dkt. # 18] is granted in part and denied in part. It is FURTHER ORDERED that
defendant shall reimburse plaintiffs for the Lab School tuition that was paid for M.K-N. for the
period between February 3, 2012 and May 31, 2012. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a).
AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge
DATE: February 10, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
K-N v. District of Columbia (K-N v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.