K K K Medicine Co. v. Foust

1915 OK 732, 151 P. 1017, 51 Okla. 484, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1023
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 5, 1915
Docket5219
StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 732 (K K K Medicine Co. v. Foust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
K K K Medicine Co. v. Foust, 1915 OK 732, 151 P. 1017, 51 Okla. 484, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1023 (Okla. 1915).

Opinion

Opinion by

MATHE'WS, C.

This case is here upon appeal from the county court of Washita county.

Plaintiff in error’s motion for a new trial was denied on the 17th day of February, 1913, upon which day final judgment was entered. Whereupon an order was made on that date giving plaintiff 60 days in which to make and serve a case-made upon the defendants in error. On April 28, 1913, an order was made extending the time 60 days for making and serving a case-made.

The period of 60 days first given the plaintiff in error to0make and serve a case-made having expired, the court had no power to grant additional time. This is jurisdictional. Korimer v. Collins, 31 Okla. 457, 122 Pac. 159; Bray v. Bray, 25 Okla. 71, 105 Pac. 200.

This rule follows an unbroken line of authorities from this and other states, and for the reasons given the appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Korimer v. Collins
1912 OK 192 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Bray v. Bray
105 P. 200 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1915 OK 732, 151 P. 1017, 51 Okla. 484, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/k-k-k-medicine-co-v-foust-okla-1915.