K. Heitz Import Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

K. Heitz Import Co. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 308

United States Customs Court·Decided January 16, 1962·No. No. 66369; protests 58/17165, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic slide frames or mounts the same as those the subject of Abstract 64154, the merchandise was held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or at 21, 20, or 19 percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic slide frames or mounts the same as those the subject of Abstract 64154, the merchandise was held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or at 21, 20, or 19 percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), as claimed.

K. Heitz Import Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 308 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

48 Cust. Ct. 308 (K. Heitz Import Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.