K. Bell & Associates, Inc. v. Syndicate 484

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

K. Bell & Associates, Inc. v. Syndicate 484

268 A.D.2d 390, 700 N.Y.S.2d 838, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 390 (K. Bell & Associates, Inc. v. Syndicate 484) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K. Bell & Associates, Inc. v. Syndicate 484, 268 A.D.2d 390, 700 N.Y.S.2d 838, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about February 2, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

After an independent evaluation, the motion court properly adopted the factual findings and legal conclusions rendered in the prior Federal actions ánd granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff insured’s claim for coverage fell squarely within the ambit of the exclusion upon which defendant insurers rely and plaintiff failed to establish any grounds upon which defendants might be barred from relying on the subject exclusion to deny cover[391]*391age. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about February 2, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

After an independent evaluation, the motion court properly adopted the factual findings and legal conclusions rendered in the prior Federal actions ánd granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff insured’s claim for coverage fell squarely within the ambit of the exclusion upon which defendant insurers rely and plaintiff failed to establish any grounds upon which defendants might be barred from relying on the subject exclusion to deny cover[391]*391age. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 390, 700 N.Y.S.2d 838, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/k-bell-associates-inc-v-syndicate-484-nyappdiv-2000.