Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/J.W. v. State

J.W. v. State

678 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8796, 1996 WL 469175
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3510
StatusPublished

This text of 678 So. 2d 11 (J.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.W. v. State, 678 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8796, 1996 WL 469175 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three issues in regard to a trial court order requiring him to pay restitution and attorney’s fees. We affirm on the first issue without further discussion. The order of the trial court making appellant directly hable for restitution is reversed. C.M. v. State, 676 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We also reverse the order directing reimbursement for attorney’s fees. L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993). On remand the trial court may again impose the fee provided appellant is given notice and an opportunity to contest the amount.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State
616 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
C.M. v. State
676 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8796, 1996 WL 469175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jw-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.