J.W. v. State

678 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8796, 1996 WL 469175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.W. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7962
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1996·No. No. 95-3510·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three issues in regard to a trial court order requiring him to pay restitution and attorney’s fees. We affirm on the first issue without further discussion. The order of the trial court making appellant directly hable for restitution is reversed. C.M. v. State, 676 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We also reverse the order directing reimbursement for attorney’s fees. L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993). On remand the trial court may again impose the fee provided appellant is given notice and an opportunity to contest the amount.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.W. v. State, 678 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8796, 1996 WL 469175 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

678 So. 2d 11 (J.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State
616 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
C.M. v. State
676 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)