JW Charles Securities, Inc. v. Nobel

702 So. 2d 235, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11220, 1997 WL 614966
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1997·No. No. 97-1331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed based on the authority of Wylie v. Investment Management and Research Inc., 629 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (en banc). We have considered the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cohen, 62 F.3d 381 (11th Cir.1995), but find no inconsistency here as the trial court found that the Uniform Submission Agreements supplied clear evidence of the parties’ intent to arbitrate the timeliness issue.

STONE, C.J., and POLEN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JW Charles Securities, Inc. v. Nobel, 702 So. 2d 235, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11220, 1997 WL 614966 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 235 (JW Charles Securities, Inc. v. Nobel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wylie v. INV. MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH INC.
629 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cohen
62 F.3d 381 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)