Juvenile Officer v. S.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Juvenile Officer v. S.M.

468 S.W.3d 906, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2015 WL 5025104

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 25, 2015·No. WD 78488·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

The parents of two children appeal a judgment terminating them parental rights, arguing that no substantial evidence was presented showing that termi[907] nation of parental rights was in the children’s best interests. Because substantial evidence was presented which supports the trial court’s conclusion that termination of parental rights was in the children’s best interests, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

The parents of two children appeal a judgment terminating them parental rights, arguing that no substantial evidence was presented showing that termi[907] nation of parental rights was in the children’s best interests. Because substantial evidence was presented which supports the trial court’s conclusion that termination of parental rights was in the children’s best interests, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Juvenile Officer v. S.M., 468 S.W.3d 906, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2015 WL 5025104 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

468 S.W.3d 906 (Juvenile Officer v. S.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.