Juvenile Officer v. A.M.M. (In re Interest of T.R.A.-M.)

Missouri Court of Appeals

Juvenile Officer v. A.M.M. (In re Interest of T.R.A.-M.)

542 S.W.3d 409

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2017·No. WD 80694·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A.M.M. (Father) appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court terminating his parental rights. He presents two points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in requiring him to request counsel in writing for his termination hearing. Second, he claims the trial court erred in proceeding with termination of Father's parental rights without counsel for Father or a waiver of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 86.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

A.M.M. (Father) appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court terminating his parental rights. He presents two points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in requiring him to request counsel in writing for his termination hearing. Second, he claims the trial court erred in proceeding with termination of Father's parental rights without counsel for Father or a waiver of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 86.16(b).

Juvenile Officer v. A.M.M. (In re Interest of T.R.A.-M.), 542 S.W.3d 409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

542 S.W.3d 409 (Juvenile Officer v. A.M.M. (In re Interest of T.R.A.-M.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.