Jutte v. Davis
This text of 47 F. 592 (Jutte v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Undoubtedly this court has jurisdiction generally ot suits in personam upon maritime contracts; and as this is such a suit against the owner of the Bengal Tiger to enforce a personal liability, and not a proceeding in rem against the steam-boat, the objection that she is a domestic vessel, and hence is not subject to a maritime lien for the claim in suit, is not well taken, and the motion to dismiss must be denied. And now, May 7, 1890, the motion to dismiss the libel is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F. 592, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jutte-v-davis-pawd-1890.