Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

245 A.D.2d 1093, 666 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13882

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted in support of the motion fails to establish as a matter of law that defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition allegedly existing in the area of the gasoline pumps where plaintiff Henry Juszczak fell (see, Morgan v Genrich, 239 AD2d 919; Panzarella v Multiple Parking Servs. [appeal No. 1], 238 AD2d 907; Keeton v Cardinal O’Hara High School, 233 AD2d 839). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, No-taro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc., 245 A.D.2d 1093, 666 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 1093 (Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keeton v. Cardinal O'Hara High School
233 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.
238 A.D.2d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Morgan v. Genrich
239 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)