Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

245 A.D.2d 1093, 666 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 1093 (Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc., 245 A.D.2d 1093, 666 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted in support of the motion fails to establish as a matter of law that defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition allegedly existing in the area of the gasoline pumps where plaintiff Henry Juszczak fell (see, Morgan v Genrich, 239 AD2d 919; Panzarella v Multiple Parking Servs. [appeal No. 1], 238 AD2d 907; Keeton v Cardinal O’Hara High School, 233 AD2d 839). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, No-taro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted in support of the motion fails to establish as a matter of law that defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition allegedly existing in the area of the gasoline pumps where plaintiff Henry Juszczak fell (see, Morgan v Genrich, 239 AD2d 919; Panzarella v Multiple Parking Servs. [appeal No. 1], 238 AD2d 907; Keeton v Cardinal O’Hara High School, 233 AD2d 839). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, No-taro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 1093, 666 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juszczak-v-noco-motor-fuels-inc-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack