Justine Burks v. SPCP Easton Village Owner LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 6, 2024
Docket01-24-00199-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Justine Burks v. SPCP Easton Village Owner LLC (Justine Burks v. SPCP Easton Village Owner LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justine Burks v. SPCP Easton Village Owner LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 6, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00199-CV ——————————— JUSTINE BURKS, Appellant V. SPCP EASTON VILLAGE OWNER LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1219934

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Justine Burks, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the

trial court’s March 4, 2024 final judgment. Appellant has failed to timely file a brief.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The record in this appeal was due on or before May 3, 2024. On March 12,

2024, the court reporter notified the Court that no record was taken in the case. The

clerk’s record was filed on May 1, 2024. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due to

be filed on or before May 31, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

Appellant did not file an appellant’s brief by that deadline. On June 17, 2024,

the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal

unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was filed within ten days of

the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief),

42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution), 42.3(c)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply with notice from Clerk

of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did

not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), (c); 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Justine Burks v. SPCP Easton Village Owner LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justine-burks-v-spcp-easton-village-owner-llc-texapp-2024.