Justin Wahl v. State of Florida
This text of Justin Wahl v. State of Florida (Justin Wahl v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-2553 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-CF-000897 _____________________________
JUSTIN WAHL,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Shannon H. McFee, Judge.
March 27, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Dortch, 317 So. 3d 1074, 1082-84 (Fla. 2021)
(holding that Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) allows a
defendant who has entered a guilty or nolo contendere plea to raise on direct appeal
the voluntariness of the plea but only “if preserved by a motion to withdraw plea”
and “hold[ing] that there is no fundamental-error exception to the preservation
requirement” of that subsection).
STARGEL, WHITE and MIZE, JJ., concur. Wyndel G. Darville, Sarasota, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Krystle Celine Cacci, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin Wahl v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-wahl-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.