Justin v. Real Option for City Kids

N.D. California

Justin v. Real Option for City Kids

DecidedJuly 16, 2024

Docket3:24-cv-03387

StatusUnknown

This text of Justin v. Real Option for City Kids (Justin v. Real Option for City Kids) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justin v. Real Option for City Kids, (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALIK M. JUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-03387-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 9 Vv. DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH 10 REAL OPTION FOR CITY KIDS, et al., COURT ORDERS ll Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 4

a 12

13 On June 6, 2024, the court, the Honorable Susan van Keulen presiding, issued an Order

14 || Denying Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Specifically, the court ordered © 15 || Plaintiff Malik M. Justin to either “(1) file a renewed application or (2) pay the filing fee” by Q 16 || July 8, 2024. See ECF 4. The court warned Mr. Justin that the failure to complete either task by

= 17 || the deadline may result in dismissal of this action. /d. The time for Mr. Justin to act has passed,

18 || and he has failed to complete either task. 19 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action of its own accord “to achieve 20 || the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 21 || (1962). By July 31, 2024, Mr. Justin shall file a written response to this order explaining why this 22 || action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute his case and to comply with court 23 || orders. If Mr. Justin fails to respond to this order by the July 31, 2024 deadline, the Court will 24 || dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: July 16, 2024 □ 27 col. 28 ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALIK M. JUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-03387-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 9 Vv. DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH 10 REAL OPTION FOR CITY KIDS, et al., COURT ORDERS ll Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 4

a 12

13 On June 6, 2024, the court, the Honorable Susan van Keulen presiding, issued an Order

14 || Denying Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Specifically, the court ordered © 15 || Plaintiff Malik M. Justin to either “(1) file a renewed application or (2) pay the filing fee” by Q 16 || July 8, 2024. See ECF 4. The court warned Mr. Justin that the failure to complete either task by

= 17 || the deadline may result in dismissal of this action. /d. The time for Mr. Justin to act has passed,

18 || and he has failed to complete either task. 19 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action of its own accord “to achieve 20 || the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 21 || (1962). By July 31, 2024, Mr. Justin shall file a written response to this order explaining why this 22 || action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute his case and to comply with court 23 || orders. If Mr. Justin fails to respond to this order by the July 31, 2024 deadline, the Court will 24 || dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: July 16, 2024 □ 27 col. 28 ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Justin v. Real Option for City Kids, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-v-real-option-for-city-kids-cand-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack