Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 377
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Cust. Ct. 216
United States Customs Court·Decided November 17, 1960·No. No. 64906; protests 144016-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to January 1, 1948, at 12% percent ad valorem under paragraph 210, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T.D. 49753), and (b) as to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after January 1, 1946, at 20 cents per dozen articles, but not less than 7% percent nor more than 25 percent ad valorem, under said paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 377 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 377 (Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)