Justin T. v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
JUSTIN T., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 25-cv-3044 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long recommending that this Court affirm the Administrative Law Judge’s decision (d/e 12). Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on or before February 19, 2026. Neither party filed objections. The district court reviews de novo any part of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to which a specific written objection has been made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999)
(also noting that a party who fails to object to the report and recommendation waives appellate review of the factual and legal questions).
After reviewing the record, the Report and Recommendation, the parties’ briefing and memoranda, and the applicable law, the Court finds no clear error in Magistrate Judge Long’s Report and
Recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long (d/e 12) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and (2) This case is closed.
ENTERED: February 20, 2026
/s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Justin T. v. Commissioner of Social Security (Justin T. v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.