Justin Shepherd v. State
This text of Justin Shepherd v. State (Justin Shepherd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-02-0241-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
JUNE 11, 2002 ______________________________
JUSTIN SHEPHERD
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 44,331-A; HON. DAVID GLEASON, PRESIDING _______________________________
ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________
Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ.
Appellant, Justin Shepherd filed a pro se notice of appeal on May 28, 2002 and a
motion to have an attorney appointed on June 10, 2002. Accordingly, we now abate this
appeal and remand the cause to the 47th District Court of Potter County (trial court) for
further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a
hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether appellant is indigent;
3. whether counsel has been appointed to prosecute this appeal;
4. if counsel has not been appointed, whether appellant is entitled to appointed
counsel; and
5. whether the appellant is entitled to the preparation of a free appellate record.
The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Furthermore, the trial court shall
execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the aforementioned issues and
disclosing the name, address, state bar number, and telephone and fax numbers of newly
appointed counsel, if any. The district court shall also cause to be developed 1) a
supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all
orders of the district court issued as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 2) a
reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the
aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall cause the supplemental
clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before July 11, 2002. Should
further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be
requested before June 11, 2002.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin Shepherd v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-shepherd-v-state-texapp-2002.