Justin Savoy v. Dr. Randy Lavespere, Dr. Daniel Crooks, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 20, 2024
Docket2024CW0856
StatusUnknown

This text of Justin Savoy v. Dr. Randy Lavespere, Dr. Daniel Crooks, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (Justin Savoy v. Dr. Randy Lavespere, Dr. Daniel Crooks, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin Savoy v. Dr. Randy Lavespere, Dr. Daniel Crooks, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, (La. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

AIM414A

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JUSTIN SAVOY NO. 2024 CW 0856

VERSUS

DR. RANDY LAVESPERE, DR.

DANIEL CROOK, STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE NOVEMBER 20, 2024 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

In Re: Justin Savoy, applying for supervisory writs, 20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No. 23359.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., THERIOT, CHUTZ, WOLFE AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART WITH ORDER AND DENIED IN PART. The district court' s June 27, 2024 appellate pauper order is vacated. Once the district court granted relator an appeal and set a return date, it no longer had jurisdiction to issue a subsequent pauper order. La. Code Civ. P. art. 2088; see Mason v. Hedrick, 2019- 113 La. App. 3d Cir. 4/ 17/ 19), 268 So. 3d 1074. This matter is remanded with instructions that the district court proceed with

lodging the appellate record with this court pursuant to the district court' s order granting the appeal. To the extent

plaintiff, Justin Savoy, seeks review of the merits in this matter,

which this court has previously ruled should be taken up on appeal, the writ application is denied.

JMG WRC CHH

Theriot and Wolfe, Ji. dissent and would deny the writ

application. Relator should have first sought review with the district court.

DaJDPUTY FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mason v. Hedrick
268 So. 3d 1074 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Justin Savoy v. Dr. Randy Lavespere, Dr. Daniel Crooks, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-savoy-v-dr-randy-lavespere-dr-daniel-crooks-state-of-louisiana-lactapp-2024.