Justin Roy Lammers v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 16, 2021·No. 13-21-00261-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00261-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUSTIN ROY LAMMERS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for possession of

controlled substance in penalty group one. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed with a judgment of conviction by jury entered

on June 8, 2021. On August 17, 2021, a notice of appeal was filed. On August 18, 2021, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not timely

perfected. Appellant was advised the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not

corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant did

not respond, and the defect is uncured.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended

in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).

Where a timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within

ninety days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(2). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days

after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion

complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.3.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

2 PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 16th day of September, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justin Roy Lammers v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Justin Roy Lammers v. the State of Texas (Justin Roy Lammers v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Ex Parte Garcia
988 S.W.2d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)