Justin Rodney Able v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 8, 2012
Docket07-12-00354-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Justin Rodney Able v. State (Justin Rodney Able v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin Rodney Able v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0354-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

OCTOBER 8, 2012

______________________________

JUSTIN RODNEY ABLE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108[TH] DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 64,848-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant, Justin Rodney Able, was convicted of evading arrest or detention, a third degree felony, enhanced to a second degree felony, and sentenced to eighteen years confinement. The Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right to Appeal filed in the case reflects that Appellant's case is a plea-bargained case with no right of appeal. The certification notwithstanding, Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal challenging his conviction. By letter dated September 13, 2012, this Court notified Appellant of the consequences of the certification and invited him to either file an amended certification showing a right to appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal on or before September 28, 2012. No response was filed. Because Appellant has failed to file an amended certification reflecting a right of appeal and has not shown good cause for continuing this appeal, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal based on the trial court's certification. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). On September 27, 2012, the trial court clerk filed a request for an extension of time in which to file the clerk's record. Our disposition of the appeal renders the request moot. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Justin Rodney Able v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-rodney-able-v-state-texapp-2012.