Justin R. Rogers v. Blount Memorial Hospital, Inc. - Concurring
This text of Justin R. Rogers v. Blount Memorial Hospital, Inc. - Concurring (Justin R. Rogers v. Blount Memorial Hospital, Inc. - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 10, 2015 Session
JUSTIN R. ROGERS V. BLOUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-18539 David R. Duggan, Judge.
No. E2015-00136-COA-R3-CV-FILED-FEBRUARY 29, 2016
D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., concurring. I concur fully in the majority’s decision in this case. I write separately only to express my opinion that the appropriate summary judgment standard to be applied by Tennessee courts now is as set forth in Rye v. Women’s Care Center of Memphis, MPLLC, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2015 WL 6457768 (Tenn. 2015), rather than Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101. I believe our Supreme Court intended for the retroactive application of Rye when it stated: “In civil cases, judicial decisions overruling prior cases generally are applied retrospectively.” Rye, ___ S.W.3d at ___n.9, 2015 WL 6457768 at *35 n.9. While there may be very little, if any, difference between the summary judgment standard as set forth in Rye and as contained in Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101, I believe Rye sets the standard and is controlling on the courts of this State.
____________________________________ D. MICHAEL SWINEY, CHIEF JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin R. Rogers v. Blount Memorial Hospital, Inc. - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-r-rogers-v-blount-memorial-hospital-inc-concurring-tennctapp-2016.